For Brodkorb is an Honorable Man.
I speak not to disprove what Brodkorb spoke,
But here I am to speak what I do know.
I read his words and ask, what sort of man wrote this?
When the story broke that on Minnesota Democrats Exposed that Al Franken hadn’t paid his workers compensation premiums for three years, Team Franken denied it. It wasn’t until the State of New York made it clear that not only hadn’t Franken paid his premiums, but that someone had apparently blown off more than a dozen letters – including a signed, certified letter telling him to pay his premiums, and then telling him to pay a $25,000 fine.
Oh yes, the labored syntax at the start
Might signify that this could be our man.
Self-reference and scarlet typography —
How could such a constant drone be plagiary?
For Franken hath transgressed against the state
While Brodkorb is an honorable man.
And yet, this alien diction
This length, so lexically complex
The Gunning-Fog near triple what we've come to know
And loathe. Analysis,
Algorithmic, doth suggest
That someone else hath spoken in his stead.
But Brodkorb is an honorable man.
Not faithful readers, nor patrons, nor keepers,
Not buttboys, Publii nor seraphim
No caries nor cadres nor campaigners
Could put words in this man's mouth.
For Brodkorb is an honorable man.
My ethics are not governed by legal
interpretations.
I am continually aware of my responsibility to disclose.
Any attempt to connect Me to any political or non-political clients
Is ridiculous,
For Brodkorb is an honorable man.
Alas, I have no documents or facts
To prove another authorship or attribution lax.
I've come to doubt my congeries of hacks
For Brodkorb is an honorable man.
[h/t Joe Bodell, who first noticed a certain stylistic inconsistency]








Recent Comments