Yesterday's news had three remarkably detailed descriptions of sex crime suspects. Here's one:
The suspect is described as a man in his 30s with light brown skin, who is possibly Hispanic or American Indian.
He is 5 feet 1 to 5 feet 2 with a muscular, stocky build and a thick
neck. He has straight short black hair that is combed back on the sides
and sticks up on top. He has medium sideburns with a thin beard along
his jaw line and a slight mustache. He has a scar running under his
left ear, a burn mark on the top of his left hand, a missing right
upper tooth and a gold upper left tooth.
He had a metal cross post earring in his left ear and walks with a
slight limp. He was wearing a white T-shirt with curved lettering on
the chest and a picture of a black male. He had a red and white bandana
around his neck and black or blue pants.
An earlier report also mentioned an "unusual body odor," which could indicate he's living on the street. Somehow, I think they'll find this guy.
*****
Speaking of unusual odors, all week a scandal has been unfolding involving British Parliament member misuse of expense accounts — which have a purpose similar to the per diems paid to Minnesota legislators who incur living expenses away from home during a session. Another purpose, of course, is to pad their salaries.
Among the most notorious, Conservative MP Douglas Hogg charged £2,200 in expenses for cleaning his moat. In the old days, you would never clean the moat because that would reduce its value as a castle defense. Today, it's the opposite. One must keep up one's property values, mustn't one?
Of course, Americans do not have moats because we are less attached to our historic home sewer systems — or if we did build a moat, we'd call it a lake and pretend the property was on an island. Plus, we have guns for home defense, which are much easier to clean. And if a legislator did have a moat that needed cleaning, it would be done by friendly private contractors who would forget to submit a bill.
*****
Speaking of hogs, a letter writer in today's Strib called out a particularly fawning 600-word editorial that supports the state's pork producers and urges American consumers to keep pork in "its time-honored spot at the family
dinner table."
All the arguments would be familiar to anyone who has been following the pork industry's PR campaign to counter unfounded consumer fears about contracting "swine flu" from pork products.
Bill Lehto disputed the editorial's position that "pork continues to be a smart, safe food choice," making counterpoints about health, environment, employment, jobs, economic impact and humane treatment of animals. It would've been a perfect letter [not yet online] had it also mentioned the number of full-page ads that have run this month in the Strib as part of the pork PR campaign.
*****
Speaking of non-transparent agendas and highly identifiable suspects, Steve Perry writes about the Minnesota false claims act passed this year, sponsored by DFL Rep. Steve Simon, signed by GOP Gov. Tim Pawlenty and opposed by former Attorney General Mike Hatch, "who first brought the idea to the
Legislature and urged its passage, back in 2004."
The about-face this year was almost universally viewed as a vendetta
against Simon, a former staffer in the attorney general's office who
incurred the wrath of Hatch and his successor, Lori Swanson, by getting the Office of Legislative Auditor to look into whistleblower claims by AG staffers.
Ah, yes. Maybe, if Peter Hutchinson hadn't split the vote in the last governor's race, we'd have a different budget and intact health and human services funding. But we'd also have Gov. Pigsticker instead of Gov. Hogwash.
Recent Comments