The story of poor Audrey Davison is starting to make the rounds among the anti-tax blogs.
Audrey Davison lives alone, gets a $620 Social Security check each
month and worries about the sharply rising taxes on her four-bedroom
house. Davison, 76, raised her family there and after 43 years, she
really doesn't want to leave Greenburgh.
Greenburgh doesn't want her to leave, either.
The
town is pushing a program that would let seniors work part-time, for $7
an hour, to help pay off some of their property taxes.
The
proposal has caused a stir in Greenburgh, a town of 90,000 in
Westchester County, which has the nation's third-highest homeowner
property taxes. The plan would be unusual if not unique in New York,
but similar programs are considered successes in Colorado,
Massachusetts, South Carolina and elsewhere.
Davison, who suffers from arthritis and sciatica and needs a walker to get around on her bad days, said she pays about $12,000 a year in property taxes — perhaps $2,000 to the town — and has already taken out a reverse mortgage to pay her bills.
Anti-Strib blames liberals for her plight and calls it "The New Slavery." Mitch pays it forward under a simple "Slavery" and sarcastically ties the Greenburgh, NY, property tax to the "happy to pay for a better Minnesota" campaign of a few years ago. (New York ranks 4th for state and local property taxes. Minnesota's 26th.)
A 76-year-old woman who sometimes uses a walker makes an
appealing martyr for the anti-tax campaign. There's no need to look any
deeper into the story if it reinforces a perception of government
insensitivity and rampant spending.
But there is more to the story.
As the article notes, Davison lives in the county with nation's
third highest property tax rates. What it doesn't say is that
her town is among the wealthiest spots in the country.
Greenburgh, NY, ranks tied for 13th in the nation for households
with country club memberships. The median home price is $592,000 and
the median family income is $111,843. The comparable numbers in Eden Prairie, MN — which ranked 10th among
Money Magazine's Best Places to live — are
$289,250 and $105,177. You can tab through other comparisons here. Greenburgh outscores many of top 10 best places on a number of measures.
Audrey Davison wants to continue living alone in a
four-bedroom house in one of the most prosperous places on the planet
and not pay the taxes that sustain the area's high-performing schools,
many libraries and very low crime rate. If she were a government
agency, she'd be instructed by the same commenters above to reassess
her priorities and try to live within her means. If she were welfare
recipient, she'd be told to exercise some personal responsibility and
get a j0b or go live with family members.
There's more.
Davison says she "pays about $12,000 a year in property taxes — perhaps $2,000 to the town." But that doesn't seem to be the case.
According to county records, a house at the address listed to an A. Davison — which was mortgaged 44 years ago and appears to be occupied by the original owner — only paid $4,707 in property taxes in 2007, up about $317 from the prior year. About $1,815 of that amount went to the town and the county combined.
Property taxes are regressive and do fall disproportionately on retired homeowners who want to stay in their homes. An argument can certainly be made for reducing the impact of taxes on people with modest, fixed incomes. And maybe her tax bill is a hardship to this woman.
But I wouldn't build my campaign to get rid of government on this case.
Recent Comments